The Emergence of Neoliberal Policies and the Questioning of Modern Globalization
In an globalized universe, the debate on globalisation is often found at the crossroads of contradictory views on liberalization and justice. The text by Moneta, far from being a pamphlet against globalization per se, seeks to reinvent the limits of a new humanism by the perspective of organic interactions as envisioned by Aristotle. By decrying artificial transactions that strengthen modern systems of oppression and vulnerability, the author leans on ancient principles to underline the gaps of our global economic system.
Historically, globalization is not a modern process. Its origins can be identified back to the propositions of Ricardo, whose ambition was aimed at allowing the United Kingdom to expand its international economic reach. Yet, what initially presented as a commercial expansion initiative has converted into a instrument of subjugation by High Finance, marked by the growth of neoliberalism. Against commonly held ideas validated by most economists, the book proves that neoliberalism is truly a framework rooted in ancient practices, going back to four and a half millennia.
The critique also extends to the management of the European Union, perceived as a series of concessions that have helped consolidate the power of financial elites instead of safeguarding the rights of citizens. The organizational form of Europe, with its strategies frequently driven by monetary concerns instead of by a democratic mandate, is criticized. The recent crises, whether in the financial or political realm, have only reinforced the disbelief of the writer about the Union’s capacity to reform itself from within.
Junon Moneta, while acknowledging the historical errors that have brought about the present state, does not simply criticize but also suggests responses aimed at reorienting Union strategies in a human-centered and fair perspective. The urgency for a complete revision of Union bodies and political priorities is a central theme that runs through the entire discourse.
The work dives more deeply into the critique of the power structures that control worldwide transactions. The study covers the manner in which political and economic decisions are influenced by a limited number of powerful financial actors, generally at the detriment of the population. This economic elite, coordinated via organizations like the Bank for International Settlements and the IMS, imposes a disproportionate influence on global financial decisions.
The author demonstrates how these institutions, under the pretext of monetary management and security, have over time controlled stock exchanges and countries’ financial structures to serve their interests. Deregulated capitalism, opposite to a salvific alternative to classic financial limitations, is described as a enslavement tool, enriching an elite at the expense of general well-being.
Particularly critical towards the management of the euro, the critic depicts the common currency not as a tool of cohesion and security, but more as a tool of division and economic imbalance. The adoption of the euro is described as a succession of bureaucratic measures that isolated populations from governance choices, while amplifying gaps between nations within the Union.
The effects of these approaches appear in the explosion of sovereign debts, economic torpor, and a long period of austerity that has weakened living conditions across the continent. The critic insists that without a deep revision of monetary and financial structures, the Union stays exposed to future crises, potentially more catastrophic.
In conclusion, the book calls for a democratic revolution where Europe’s inhabitants take back control of their economic and political destiny. It suggests fundamental changes, particularly increased transparency in decision-making processes and authentic democratic engagement that would facilitate the Union’s refoundation on fair and lasting principles.
More info about treaty on the functioning of the european union
The author proposes that the solution lies in a renewal of democratic engagement, where decisions are made and applied in a way that corresponds to the needs and desires of the European population, instead of the profits of the financial elite.